by CHUCKX53 » Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:33 am
We are to assume that this light has already been excessed, as the first story stated that the Historical Commission "owns" the light -- The second story states that it is a "navigational landmark", so we can guess that maybe, if operational, it is a private AToN ??
The $1.7 million cost reported in the first article covered the transport AND repair, but the second article assigned the entire $1.7 million to just moving the light to the park........
If the CG no longer cares for this 124-year old light, then the Historical Commission will have to bear all future costs to maintain this light, no matter where it is located at............
It most certianly will be destroyed if it remains in it's present location, if not with the next hurricane, then with any of the number of ones to follow (and they WILL happen, this is the Gulf we're speaking of here) -- And, even so, the costs to maintain it at it's present location are only going to esclalate over time, and with no guarantee that it won't be wacked by a future hurricane, this seems like a no-brainer to me, in my humble opinion.........
I would say, move it first, and worry about the restoration costs later, after it is relativitly safe on dry land -- and future maintenance costs will be a fraction of what it would take if left in it's present location.........
LIVE LONG AND PROSPER